Skip to main content

Environment & ethics   |   Price

Sustainability: A luxury you can't afford

Vote with your wallets. So goes the saying that concludes so many ethically-minded opinion pieces and calls to action.

There are plenty of reasons to do so, as the western world wakes up to the value of sustainable supply chains in food, clothing, beauty and beyond. But there is also a huge gap in this approach that rather than being mentioned just in passing, should arguably be central to the debate.

Since the 2008 financial crash, average weekly wages have stagnated, failing to return to pre-crash levels despite the economy returning to growth. 14 million people (22 per cent of the population) live on incomes below the poverty line, while one in 14 adults in the UK have had to use a food bank.

Clearly, while ethical buying might be high on the agenda for some, for others it is far from a priority. So how can sustainable food, whether that’s organic or just locally sourced, ever become affordable, and therefore mainstream, enough to genuinely transform the food system?

Speaking at the Food Matters Live conference at the end of last year, food writer and activist Jack Monroe, said: “I think a sustainable diet means different things to different people. My concern with these broad-brush definitions is a lot of people don’t have these choices. I think we’ve got to be very careful that we don’t marginalise a whole segment of society.”

For Monroe, whose latest cook book collected her best recipes using tinned food with the proceeds going to food banks, it must come down to price. “I think that incentive and subsidy is a much more effective strategy than taxation. The sugar tax, for example, all it does is penalise those who are taking quick fixes,” she says. “Subsidising plant-based suppliers and encouraging innovation would be a much better use of government power.”

Alexandra Rose
Swapping vouchers for fresh produce incentivises a healthier diet

Jonathan Pauling is the chief executive of food charity Alexandra Rose, whose so-called ‘Rose’ vouchers can be swapped for fresh fruit and veg at local markets. The scheme is run in partnership with local market traders and councils, and aimed at families who cannot afford fresh produce. He says: “I really see the dynamics of cost as a real barrier to sustainable food. Currently in the UK, we know that families are struggling to access not only healthy food, but any food at all.”

A new report by the Food Foundation found that low income families would currently have to spend 74 per cent of their disposable income on food to meet the government’s recommended Eat Well diet. The think tank also worked out that calories from unhealthy food are three times cheaper than those from healthy foods. But Pauling says he doesn’t think simply lowering prices is the answer, and instead accessibility and a financial incentive, such as a voucher to spend locally, are the best ways of encouraging healthy diets.

Alexandra Rose focuses on fruit and veg intake as the “baseline indicator” of a healthy diet that is often missing from low income areas. But Pauling believes a similar model could also be used to incentivise a sustainable, as well as healthy, food system. In the US, people redeeming similar government food vouchers get double the value if they spend them at a local farmers’ market, which in turn supports local sustainable farming businesses.

“You can see how the government could get behind this,” says Pauling. “The work they’ve done in the US is very valuable. It started out in farmers’ markets but it’s expanded into convenience stores and now supermarkets.

“It is pump priming the type of food system that we eventually want. We don’t want the food system to be propped up by tax credits, which already top up the wages of many. But why not try a different type of subsidy, or ‘sticking plaster’, that supports people’s access to healthy and sustainable food and the type of food economy we really need.”

The image of a ‘sticking plaster’ does a good job of describing what is a short-term solution to the cost of sustainable food, according to Dan Crossley, executive director of sustainable food think tank Food Ethics Council, who says: “I don’t think that price is the biggest barrier, I’d say it’s income. In this consumerist world, we’re told everything is about price.”

Both Pauling and Crossley point to things like a real living wage, getting people back into work, and unfreezing benefits, as wider structural and political solutions that could help people afford and choose ethical food. 

Calculating the 'true cost' of food could reduce the cost of sustainable food

Calculating ‘true cost’ of food is another idea – pricing food according to its impact on the environment and use of resources. “The starting point for me, rather than making things cheaper, is if you incorporate the true cost of food then some prices would go up, and sustainable products would be relatively cheaper,” says Crossley, adding: “The price of organic is probably closer to the true cost of food.”

As a public letter highlighted this week, simply redistributing leftover food to those in need falls far short of tackling the UK’s major inequality problem. “It’s really important that we don’t create a two or three tier system so it’s not a case of giving leftover food to left behind people,” says Crossley, who believes the solution must aim high. “From a dignity perspective, I much prefer a universal approach, so there isn’t that embarrassment or shame.”

If sustainable food is to have any hope of creating a better food system, with less impact on the environment, a strong rural economy and an accessible, healthy food culture, it’s vital that the issues of affordability and inequality remains central to the debate.



2 Years

V Good point that giving charitable donations or leftovers to those in need is patronising and creates a 2 tier system.... One way to empower people to eat well is via urban growing schemes, in schools and communities, - it might even produce a whole new generation of veg lovers!

0 Reply


2 Years

Trafford Borough Council have introduced food vouchers . This avoids the whole patronising bullshit approach of the food bank system i.e. you'll eat what you're given whether it suits your diet, age , creed or medical situation or not . With a voucher you can get what YOU need - vegan, veggie , pescatarian, omnivore , body builder or couch potato - your choice as an adult human being . The only food bank " gift " I received was so fucking inappropriate as to be 70% useless - when did Cocopops become a staple ffs?

0 Reply

Guy's news

Read the weekly newsletter from Riverford founder Guy Singh-Watson with the latest from the farm, food politics and anything in between.

Read now

Choose food that hasn't flown.

Riverford organic veg boxes are delivered directly to your door. Choose your box now.

Go to Riverford

How to live simply

Many of us feel the pressure to look for the best Black Friday deal but living ‘simply’ can move our habits and interests elsewhere.  

Read more

Grow Your Own

Read our monthly gardening advice column for timely advice for your organic patch.


Boom in organic unmatched by farming

Sales of organic boomed during 2020 as the pandemic boosted interest in food quality but growth will be met by imports as UK farmers hold back.

Read more

Join the Wicked Leeks community

Sign up for the newsletter and receive the five latest stories, once a week. Wicked Leeks magazine is published by organic veg box company Riverford.

Spread the word

The twin crises of climate change and biodiversity losses will be the defining stories of our future, but it is not too late to change direction. 

Here at Wicked Leeks, our mission is to help inform and inspire positive change. Our journalism is free to all because of this, but we want to reach as many people as possible who share our desire for a better world. We know our readers are some of the biggest advocates of sustainable living, and you can help us grow this movement by sharing this article widely, with your friends and on social media. Now is the time to act.