Skip to main content

Climate change   |   Environment & ethics

Lifestyle changes won’t stop the climate emergency

It can be easy when it comes to environmental issues for my concerns to narrow down to the individual level. Weighed down by guilt, I continually ask myself how I can do less damage to the planet. I never drive, fly only once every two years, get my plastic and paper recycled, don’t eat meat or use plastic bags and recently started using bamboo toothbrushes and shampoo and shaving bars to cut my plastic waste.

If I’m not looking at my own actions, I’m looking at what my fellow citizens are doing. I struggle to understand how people can leave their engines idling while eating fast food, or watching movies on their iPads in their cars, or how they can allow themselves to get multiple flights per year. Sometimes my frustration at others’ inaction is so intense it makes my temples throb.

But arguments like the one delivered by independent researcher and author Dario Kenner at Toynbee Hall in East London last month remind me that the solutions to our environmental woes lie more in challenging our economic elites, than in persuading ordinary individuals to change their behaviour.

Eco toothbrushes
From toothbrushes to coffee cups: individuals are encouraged to reduce their impact.

For one thing, the super rich do far more harm to the planet through their consumption than the rest of us. Kenner pointed out that in 2013 in the UK, the richest one pe cent (64,000 people) were responsible for 147 tonnes of Co2 each, while the poorest 10 per cent (six million people) were responsible for just four tonnes per head.

But what is less well understood, explained Kenner, is how much harm is done through the investments of the ‘polluter elite’, the wealthy people who run fossil fuel multinationals. Petrol giant BP’s CEO, Bob Dudley, for example, was responsible for 4,307 tonnes of carbon emissions in 2015 courtesy of his 0.008 per cent share in the company, which generated 51,200,000 tonnes of emission that year.  

Rather than trying to make amends for what they’ve done, the polluter elite is doing everything in its power to block a transition to a green economy, using its political muscle to keep us dependent on their energy sources.

In 2008, the Climate Change Act was passed in the UK, making us the first country to set legally binding carbon emission targets. But in 2015 the polluter elite stepped in to reverse the good work by setting up the Oil and Gas Authority, a body designed to maximise oil and gas extraction in the UK.

Using a combination of lobbying power and donations, the polluter elite has also prevented us from switching to electric cars and persuaded government to back fracking and provide oil and gas companies with subsidies.

Air pollution
Investors in fossil fuel companies is far more damaging to the planet than the average.

Meanwhile, explained Kenner, the UK is loath to challenge the energy companies because our economy needs oil and gas to achieve annual increases in GDP, a useless measure of progress that governments nonetheless consider vital to their political survival.

Only if government feels pressured by public protests, says Kenner, will it consider taking the kinds of actions that could weaken the polluter companies’ influence.

His argument makes sense. Individual lifestyle changes are certainly welcome, but the scale of change required for us to avert ecological disaster can only be made by governments and fossil fuel multinationals, neither or which will voluntarily change their ways.

For ordinary folk, this means our prime focus needs to switch from lifestyle changes to protests. With the window of opportunity to stop irreversible climate change rapidly closing, we can no longer hide behind our curtains and hope for the best. It’s time to take to the streets and demand that our government steer us away from the cliff edge.


    All That Matters

    1 Year 6 Months

    According to the stats here: ,giving up your car is three times as significant as taking up a plant-based diet, and giving up one flight twice as effective, over a year. All of these lifestyle changes are, however, nothing compared to not breeding. Just having one child produces 70+ times as much CO2 as can be saved by switching to a vegan diet. Any Ferrari-driving, meat-eating, international jet-setter who opts not to reproduce is likely to contribute less to ruining the environment than any parent who lives car-free, as a vegan and holidays at home. It's all that matters.

    0 Reply


    1 Year 6 Months

    But if you don't have children, what's the point?

    1 Reply

    view replies

    All That Matters

    1 Year 6 Months

    Hi Beth

    The point is that if the species is to survive NOT having children is the best - if not the only - way to do it. Having more children is only going to make things much, much worse while the effect of any other lifestyle change is really negligible in comparison. If no one bred for 50 years the species would survive. Having children and then bemoaning the state of the planet suggests an advanced degree of cognitive dissonance. It is like smashing someone's window and then offering them some Sellotape to fix it.

    And I am sure plenty of people - myself included - who have chosen not to have children, or those who wanted to but could not have children, would be interested to know why you think their lives have no point! Some people may only be validated by breeding, but plenty are not.

    2 Replies

    Jolly Green Giant

    1 Year 6 Months

    All That Matters. My calculations may be wrong but I don't think stopping breeding for 50 years would work. Firstly who would do the breeding in year 51, most women will have reacted the menopause by then. Secondly you will have an aging population with no younger people to support them. Perhaps you envisage some technical developments; bioengineering to change the menopause or robots to look after the elderly or perhaps euthanasia.

    1 Reply

    All That Matters

    1 Year 6 Months

    Humans can breed after the age of 50. Out of the millions born today some will be fertile in 50 years. That's the point.
    What on Earth has supporting an aging population got to do with the survival of the species?
    PS does,anybody want some courgettes or runner beans?

    1 Reply


    1 Year 6 Months

    @All that matters

    Love your comments. And no thanks, got tons of courgettes and beans!!

    0 Reply


    1 Year 6 Months

    Well said 👏👏👏

    0 Reply

    Tom McDonough

    Tom McDonough is a London-based freelance blogger and journalist who writes primarily about UK economic inequality, disabled people's rights and Vietnam, a country he lived in for seven years. He writes for campaign group My Fair London.


    The power of 'what if?'

    All too often we default to dystopian images, rather than allowing ourselves to believe that it could actually be amazing: more connected, happier, healthier, with cleaner air, better food.

    Read more

    Live Life on the Veg

    Riverford's recipe hub, with recipes, veg help and foodie inspiration.

    Go to Riverford

    Climate change: A forager’s perspective

    Early wild garlic, berries behaving oddly and unpredictable wild nut harvests: as a forager I notice the tiniest signs that our climate is changing and worry what the future holds.

    Read more
    Spread the word

    The twin crises of climate change and biodiversity losses will be the defining stories of our future, but it is not too late to change direction. 

    Here at Wicked Leeks, our mission is to help inform and inspire positive change. Our journalism is free to all because of this, but we want to reach as many people as possible who share our desire for a better world. We know our readers are some of the biggest advocates of sustainable living, and you can help us grow this movement by sharing this article widely, with your friends and on social media. Now is the time to act.